Publication Etchics

Ethics Publications and statements of Malpractice

Journal PubBis is Journal of thought and research of public administration and business administration, published by the College of Administrative Sciences Tabalong. This statement describes the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the Act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, Chairman of the Editorial Board, Penyuting, peer-reviewers (partner bestari) and publishers. This statement is based on best practice Guidelines for Journal Editors according to COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).

Ethical guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Journal PubBis is crucial in the development of science. It is a direct reflection of the quality of a work of authors and institutions that support. Supporting peer-reviewed articles and manifest the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior that is expected for all parties involved in the Act of publishing: author, editor of the journal, bebestari partners (peer reviewers), publishers and societies.

The College of Administrative Sciences Tabalong as Publisher Journal PubBis full responsibility on all levels of publication and we menyadari our responsibility and ethics. We are committed to ensuring that the advertisements, reprints or other commercial income will not affect or influence the editorial decision. In addition, the College of Administrative Sciences and the Board of editors of the Tabalong will help in communications with other journals and/or Publisher when it is needed.

Publication of decision

The editor of the journal PubBis is responsible for deciding which articles can be published to the journal. Validation of the work in question and it is important for researchers and readers should always encourage the decision. The editors can be guided by the policy of the Journal editorial board and constrained by the provisions of the law such as the enactment of the legal rules concerning the start of defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors can negotiate with other editors or partner bebestari in making this decision.

Fair Treatment

Editors evaluate manuscripts at any time based on the intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and editorial staff of any obligation not to disclose any information regarding a manuscript submitted in addition to the author for correspondence, partners bestari, Advisory editors, and publishers.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Unpublished material is expressed in a manuscript submitted should not be used in the research of the editors themselves without the written consent of the author.

The Task Of The Author

Standard Reporting

The author of the report from the original research should present an accurate report of work done as well as objective discussion about it. The underlying data must be accurate in such research. A study must contain sufficient detail and references to be able to allow others to read and learn about such research. Report fraud or inaccurate data is behavior that is unethical and unacceptable

Data access and retention

Authors are requested to provide the raw data about such research for editorial, and must be prepared to be able to provide access to public data, If possible, the data are stored and prepared for reasons of time after publication.

Originality and Plagiaris

The authors must ensure that their works are entirely wrote is original, and if the author has used a job and/or words of others, then it's obvious that the study cited or quoted.

The publication of multiple, Redundant or Concurrent

An author should not generally publish the manuscript describing the same basic research on more than one journal or publication. Sending the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously publishing behavior is unethical and unacceptable.

Acknowledgement Of Sources

The proper recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author should mention references used in writing scientific articles.

The recognition of Kepenulisan against Research

Recognition shall be limited to those who have done significant contributions towards the conception, design, implementation, or the interpretation of the research reported. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Others who have participated in the substantive aspects of a particular research project, they should be recognized or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors of the appropriate and there is no co-author inappropriate, which is included in the study, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the research and had agreed to the submission for publication.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

All authors must disclose any financial or substantive conflict of interests which might be construed to affect the results or their interpretation in the script. All sources of financial support for the project must also be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When authors find significant errors or inaccuracies in the paper which was published on its own, it is the obligation of the author to immediately inform the on the journal editor or Publisher and work with editors to be able to improve the text.

the task editor

Fair treatment

Editors evaluate the script at any time to the intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of its author.

Confidentiality

The editor and editorial staff each must not disclose any information about a manuscript that has been submitted in addition to the authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial Adviser to the more appropriate, and Publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Unpublished material is expressed in a manuscript submitted should not be used in the research of the editors themselves without the written consent of the author.

Publication Of Decision

The Board of Editors of the journal PubBis is responsible for deciding which articles can be published to the journal. Validation for questions is important for researchers and readers should always encourage the decision. The editors can be guided by the policy of the Journal editorial board and constrained by the provisions of the law such as the enactment of the legal rules concerning the start of defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can consult with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Script Reviews

Editors should ensure that each script is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. the editor has to set up and use peer review of an accomplished and thoughtful. Editors should explain their peer review process as information for authors and also indicates which part of the journals that have been reviewed. Editors should use peer reviewers are right in the study for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise, so that it can avoid a conflict of interest.

Task Reviewers

Contribution to the Editorial Decisions

Partner bestari (Peer review) assist editors in making editorial decisions through editorial communication with the author, in addition can also help authors to improve the quality of research.

The accuracy:

Partner selected bebestari and felt unworthy to review the research reported in the paper, should tell the editor and ask myself from the editing process.

Standards Of Objectivity

Editing should be done objectively. personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should clearly express their views with supporting arguments.

Confidentiality

Manuscript is accepted to do the editing to be treated as a confidential document. They should not be shown or discussed with anyone else except when permitted by the editor.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Privileged information or ideas gained through peer review should be kept confidential and not be used for personal benefit. The partner is not allowed to consider Bebestari script based on a conflict of interest in competitive, collaborative, or a relationship or connection with one of the authors, companies, or agencies related to the research.

Acknowledgement Of Sources

The reviewer should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Statement regarding observation, derivation, or arguments that have been previously reported should be accompanied by relevant quotes. The reviewer must also communicate with editors when there are substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript to be published