• Singgih Priono STIA Bina Banua Banjarmasin
  • Septeria Noor Yuliannisa STIA Bina Banua Banjarmasin
  • Bakhtiar STIA Bina Banua Banjarmasin
  • Muhammad Jamili Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Publik, STIA Bina Banua Banjarmasin
  • Ali Khamdan Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Publik, STIA Bina Banua Banjarmasin



Survey, Satisfaction, Survey Satisfaction, Non-Cash Food Aid


Non-cash Food Aid Users (BPNT) is food aid from the government that is given to Beneficiary Families (KPM) every month through an electronic account mechanism which is used only to  buy food at  E-Warong (Electronic Mutual Cooperation Stalls). In Presidential Regulation Number 63 of 2017 that the Indonesian people who get BPNT are people who are classified as poor even though in its implementation there are many things that do not match the amount of assistance with the basic needs of the community so that this assistance is complained of by the community. This research, entitled "Satisfaction Survey of Non-Cash Food Assistance Users in East Banjarmasin District", has a formulation of the problem of how satisfied BPNT program users are in East Banjarmasin District. The purpose of this study was to determine the user satisfaction of the BPNT program in East Banjarmasin District.

This research uses descriptive quantitative method using several data collection techniques such as questionnaires, observation, and documentation. The data sources used are primary data from questionnaires and observations and secondary data from the regulation of the Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2017. Data will be analyzed using a Likert scale and community satisfaction index.

Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, the community satisfaction survey consists of 9 indicators, then there are indicators that must be improved, namely time indicators, officer competence and complaints handling indicators, while the indicators that are maintained are requirements indicators, procedures, product specifications, costs, behavior. officers and infrastructure, based on the calculation of SKM, the results obtained are 75.875 compared to table II between 65.00 - 76.60 with interval C values converted to quality Service Unit performance is in a poor position.


David Osborne Ted Gaebler. 2008. Mewirausahakan Birokrasi (Reinventing Government). Teruna Gravika: Jakarta

Denhardt, Janet V. and Denhardt, Robert B. 2003. The New Public Service: Serving, not Steering. New York: M.E. Sharpe. Inc

F.L, Whitney.1960. The Elements of Resert.Asian Eds. Osaka:Overseas Book Co.

George Frederickson. 1997. The Spirit of Public Administration. Jossey-Bass Publisher. San Fransisco.

Kasiram, Moh. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian. Malang: UIN-Malang Pers.

Lewis, Carol W., and Stuart C. Gilman. 2005. The Ethics Challenge in Public Service: A Problem-Solving Guide. Market Street, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1998), SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for Measuring consumer perceptions of service quality, Journal of Retaling, vol. 64 No, 1, pp. 12-40

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2017 tentang pedoman penyusunan survei kepuasan masyarakat unit penyelenggara layanan publik.

Sianipar. (2012). Manajemen Pelayanan Masyarakat, (Jakarta:Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia).

Sondang P. Siagian. 2016. Sistem Informasi Manajemen, Bumi Aksara. Jakarta

Sugiyono, 2009, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung : Alfabeta







How to Cite

Priono, S., Noor Yuliannisa, S., Bakhtiar, Jamili, M., & Khamdan, A. (2022). SURVEY OF NON-CASH FOOD AID USERS IN EAST BANJARMASIN SUB-DISTRICT. PubBis : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik Dan Administrasi Bisnis, 6(2), 153–161.